Disposed

Chitra v. the Director of Medical Education

Madras HC25 Oct 2019WP(MD)/22042/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking reinstatement after the conviction leading to the petitioner's dismissal was set aside by this Court. The Bench directed the petitioner to submit a representation, mandating the employer to reconsider on merits within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit a representation; Director directed to reconsider petition on merits within two weeks.

Chitra Vs the Director of Medical Education — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.22042 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.10.2019 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD) No.22042 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.18799, 18801 and 18803 of 2019

Chitra

... Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai-10.

¶8

2.The Dean,

¶9

Mahathma Gandhi Memorial Government Hospital, Trichy District. ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order made in Ref.No.20889/SC11/1/2019, by the first respondent dated 19.09.2019 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner's in service with all attendant monetary and service benefits with continuity.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Vadivel For Respondents : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan, Special Government Pleader.

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This Writ Petition is filed to quash the order of the first respondent dated 19.09.2019 and to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant and monetary benefits with continuity of service.

¶14

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was dismissed from service, in view of the conviction order passed in C.A.No.22 of 2016 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai. Against which, the petitioner has preferred Crl.R.C.(MD)No.443 of 2019 before this Court. Now, this Court, by the order dated 18.10.2019, has set aside the conviction order passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai, in C.A.No.22 of 2016.

¶15

3.In view of the above, without deciding the issues on merits, this Court directs the petitioner to give a representation to the first respondent, enclosing the order dated 18.10.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ passed by this Court in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.443 of 2019, within a

¶16

1/2

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.22042 of 2019

¶18

period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the first respondent is directed to consider the same, in the light of the order dated 18.10.2019 passed in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.443 of 2019, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks thereafter.

¶19

4.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶20

5.Post the matter on 15.11.2019 for reporting compliance.

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

Myr

¶24

To 1.The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai-10. 2.The Dean, Mahathma Gandhi Memorial Government Hospital, Trichy District.

¶25

Copy to

¶26

The Section Officer, Writ Section Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai (Post the matter on 15.11.2019 for reporting compliance) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-94877[F] dated 30/10/2019 )

¶27

W.P.(MD)No.22042 of 2019 25.10.2019

¶28

KM/(08.11.2019) 2P 5C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

Chitra v. the Director of Medical Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chitra v. the Director of Medical Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Kanimozhi Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

P.Solamalai, Vs the Secretary to the Govt.

S.Manivannan Vs the Director General

A.K.Akilandeswar, Vs the Secretary to Government

M.Uma Maheswari Vs The Principal Secretary to Govt.

D.Ayya Kannu Vs the Management