A.Thirumurugan, S/O.Arumugam v. the State Chief Executive
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to withdraw resignation and resume work. Court found the petitioner had already been relieved from the post by the time of hearing.
Petitioner sought writ to withdraw resignation and resume work. Court found the petitioner had already been relieved from the post by the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05.03.2019 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
WP(MD)No.161 of 2016 and W.M.P.( MD).Nos.124 & 125 of 2016
A.Thirumurugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State Chief Executive Officer, (SOH), G.V.K.EMRT 108 Ambulance, Chennai.
2.The Joint Director of Health & Family, Welfare Department, Periyakulam, Theni District.
3.The Divisional Manager, 108, Ambulance Office, Bala Rengapuram, BP Road, Madurai-625 009. 4.The District Coordinator, 108, Ambulance Service, Sathirapatti Main Road, Aranmanai Pudur, Theni, Theni District. 5.Vaitheeswari EMT ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 276 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to consider the withdrawal letter dated 02.09.2015 to drop his resignation dated 22.8.2015 and consequently permit the petitioner herein to discharge his work with all service benefits within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Appadurai For R1 : Mr.P.Murugesan For R2 to R5 : No Appearance
ORDER
The petitioner has come forward with the present Writ Petition seeking to direct the respondents herein to consider his withdrawal letter dated 02.09.2015 to drop his resignation dated 22.8.2015 and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ consequently permit the petitioner herein to discharge his work with all service benefits.
2
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the writ petitioner was subsequently relieved from the post and thereafter, yet another person was appointed in the said post.
3.In view of the above submission, recording the same, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Joint Director of Health & Family, Welfare Department,
Periyakulam, Theni District.
+1. C.C. to M/S.K.Appadurai, Advocate SR.No. 52146
+1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 52456
WP(MD)No.161 of 2016
TSG JM/04.04.2019/2P/4C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner should be directed to withdraw his resignation to continue work with service benefits.
A.Thirumurugan
The State Chief Executive Officer (SOH), G.V.K.EMRT 108 Ambulance, Chennai
The Joint Director of Health & Family, Welfare Department, Periyakulam
The Divisional Manager, 108, Ambulance Office, Bala Rengapuram
The District Coordinator, 108, Ambulance Service, Sathirapatti Main Road
Vaitheeswari EMT
R.Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court