Disposed

K.Vidhya, v. the Registrar of Co-Operative

Madras HC1 Mar 2019WP(MD)/4139/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition for payment of arrears, subsistence allowance, and death benefits under Group Insurance Scheme. Court directed petitioner to obtain No Objection Certificate from other legal heirs to release benefits.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to obtain No Objection Certificate from other legal heirs and submit it within two weeks; respondents directed to disburse benefits within two weeks thereafter.

K.Vidhya, Vs the Registrar of Co-Operative — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 01.03.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.4139 of 2017 and WMP(MD).Nos.8351 of 2017 and 11576 of 2018

¶7

K. Vidhya ... Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Natarajan Maaligai, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai.

¶10

2.The District Collector, Collectorate, Sivagangai.

¶11

3.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Sivagangai.

¶12

4.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Sivagangai. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents to pay the arrears of salary for four months to the husband of the petitioner viz., late S.Kaleeswaren and to pay the subsistence allowance from the date of suspension to till the death of petitioner's husband and to release the money payable under the Ground Insurance Scheme and death benefits to the petitioner as sole nominee on the death of her husband in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2017.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr. R. Narendran

¶15

For Respondents : Mr. V. Anand Government Advocate

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the respondents to release the amount payable to the petitioner under the Group Insurance Scheme and the death benefits, as sole nominee on the death of her husband viz., S.Kaleeswaren, based on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ her representation dated 27.01.2017.

¶18

¶19

The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation sent by her dated 27.01.2017, for the release of death benefits of her husband viz., S. Kaleeswaran, has not been considered so far and hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶20

The learned Government Advocate appearing for the

¶21

respondents submitted that such representation would be considered on merits provided the petitioner produces “No Objection Certificate” from other legal heirs.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this

¶23

Writ Petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to obtain “No Objection Certificate” from the other legal heirs so as to get Group Insurance as well as other service benefits and place the same before the concerned respondents, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such certificate placed before the concerned respondents, they are directed to disburse the entire benefits within a period of two weeks thereafter. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶24

trp To

¶25

1.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Natarajan Maaligai, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai.

¶26

2.The District Collector, Collectorate, Sivagangai.

¶27

3.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Sivagangai.

¶28

4.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Sivagangai.

¶29

+1CC TO MR.R.NARENDRAN, Advocate Sr. No. 51215 +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.No. 51715

¶30

W.P.(MD) No.4139 of 2017 and WMP(MD).Nos.8351 of 2017 and 11576 of 2018 01.03.2019

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TR (23.04.2019) 2P 7C

K.Vidhya, v. the Registrar of Co-Operative

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Vidhya, v. the Registrar of Co-Operative

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

U.Raja, S/O. Unoose, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A.Raju, Staff NO.84 Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

K.Ravichanran, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

M.Balasubramanian, Vs the Registrar of Co-Op

S.Velmurugan, Vs the Registrar of Co-Operative

M.Parvathi, Vs the Secretary