Held that the writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking direction to include the petitioner in a select list was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing.
The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.07.2019 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.(MD).No.13268 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
S.Sarbudeen ... Petitioner -Vs-
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003.
2.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the select list and appoint the petitioner under the category of Group-IV Services Select List published in the Website date 27.03.2014 as per Notification No.9 of 2013, dated 14.06.2013 of the second respondent after strictly following the 3.5% of reservation policy and roster position under the category of Backward Class (Muslim).
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil
ORDER
When the writ petition was listed on 22.07.2019, there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. Hence, the same was posted under the caption “for dismissal” on 23.07.2019. Today (23.07.2019), when the writ petition was taken up for hearing under the same caption, none represented on behalf of the writ petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
/ True Copy /
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS- )
+1 CC to M/s.K.K.SENTHIL, Advocate ( SR-77515[F] dated 25/07/2019 )
W.P.(MD).No.13268 of 2014
sji ES/31.07.2019/2P/2C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be decided in the absence of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Sarbudeen
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission
The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
