Disposed

S.Kosal Ram v. the Commissioner of

Madras HC30 Apr 2019WP(MD)/11278/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a retired nursing assistant, filed a writ petition directing the respondent Commissioner to act on his representation for correcting service register entries and issuing revised pension proposals. The Court, hearing the parties by consent and without examining merits, directed the respondent to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks after a

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 12.03.2019, give him an opportunity of hearing, and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks.

S.Kosal Ram Vs the Commissioner of — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.04.2019 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶4

W.P(MD) No.11278 of 2019

S.Kosal Ram

... Petitioner

vs.

The Commissioner of Panchayat Union, Kalakad Panchayat Union, Kalakad @ Salai Pudur, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶9

... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent i.e., Commissioner, Kalakad Panchayat Union @ Salai Pudur, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation dated 12.03.2019 regarding making entries in his Service Register regarding his service as Male Nursing Assistant, Grade-I from 01.06.1988 and to send revised pension proposals, within a specified time frame, that may be fixed by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner :Mr.S.Visvalingam

¶12

For Respondent :Mr.M.Rajarajan

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation dated 12.03.2019 with regard to making entries in his Service Register regarding his service as Male Nursing Assistant, Grade-I from 01.06.1988 and to send the revised pension proposals.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

¶16

3.The case of the petitioner is that he was serving as a Special Grade Male Nursing Assistant in the Panchayat Union https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Hospital, Kalakad. He retired from service on 31.03.2013. According to the petitioner, he made a representation dated 12.03.2019 to the

¶17

¶18

respondent to make entries in his Service Register regarding his service as Male Nursing Assistant, Grade-I from 01.06.1988 and to get the revised pension. But no order has been passed on the same till date. Hence, this writ petition has been filed seeking the aforementioned relief.

¶19

4.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, submitted that the representation of the petitioner would be considered on merits and appropriate orders be passed by the respondent.

¶20

5.In view of the above submission, this Court without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.03.2019 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶21

6.The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

¶22

/ True Copy /

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

¶25

¶26

The Commissioner of Panchayat Union, Kalakad Panchayat Union, Kalakad @ Salai Pudur, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶27

( SR-64164[F] dated 30/04/2019 )

¶28

ES/20.05.2019/2P/3C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Kosal Ram v. the Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Kosal Ram v. the Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Ramesh, Vs the District Collector

P.Selvakumar Francis Vs the District Elementary

E.Nazar, S/O. S.Ebrahim, Vs the Secretary to Govt.

P.Ramachandran Vs the Assistant Manager

M. Sevaran Vs the District Welfare Officer

N.Nanthakumar Vs the Managing Director