Disposed

P.Ramachandran v. the Assistant Manager

Madras HC30 Apr 2019WP(MD)/10661/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, disposed of a writ petition filed by P. Ramachandran seeking certiorari to quash an order of the Respondent. The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's fresh representation submitted after a prior order, decide the matter on merits after an opportunity of hearing within six weeks, and dismissed the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

P.Ramachandran Vs the Assistant Manager — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 30.04.2019

¶4

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.10661 of 2019 and WMP(MD)No.8164 of 2019

P.Ramachandran

...Petitioner

/Vs./

The Assistant Manager (Provident Fund), Tamil Nadu Express State Transport Corporation, Tiruvalluvar Illam, No.2, Pallavan Road, Chennai – 600 002. ...Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the respondent in foj foj vz;.017102/Xa;3/itep/mtpnghfjeh/18[ dated 10.04.2019 without notice and quash the same as illegal.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Azhageson

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.K.Sathiyasingh

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.

¶15

2.Though the prayer sought for in this writ petition is for issuance of writ of Certiorari, this Court, on 27.04.2019, directed the petitioner to submit all the details before the authorities. Accordingly, today, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as directed by this Court, the petitioner submitted a fresh representation before the respondent along with materials.

¶16

3.In such view of the matter, the respondent is directed to consider the said representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

4.With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed

¶19

¶20

of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

Assistant Registrar ()

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

¶25

The Assistant Manager (Provident Fund), Tamil Nadu Express State Transport Corporation, Tiruvalluvar Illam, No.2, Pallavan Road, Chennai – 600 002.

¶26

1 CC to M/s.A.AZHAGESON, Advocate ( SR-64375[F] dated 30/04/2019 )

¶27

rj2

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.10661 of 2019 30.04.2019

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Ramachandran v. the Assistant Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

P.Ramachandran v. the Assistant Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Ramesh, Vs the District Collector

P.Selvakumar Francis Vs the District Elementary

E.Nazar, S/O. S.Ebrahim, Vs the Secretary to Govt.

S.Kosal Ram Vs the Commissioner of

M. Sevaran Vs the District Welfare Officer

N.Nanthakumar Vs the Managing Director