T.Sankar v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 8768 of 2018 filed by T. Sankar against UCO Bank. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition on application and endorsed it as withdrawn accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition granted; the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 16.05.2019
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.No.8768 of 2018
T.Sankar
... Petitioner Vs
- UCO Bank Represented by its Branch Manager, Villianur Branch, Puducherry, Villianur Madhakoil Street, Puducherry – 605 005.
- UCO Bank, Represented by its Chief Manager, Chennai Head Office, No. 328, 1st Floor, Thambu Chetty Street, Parrys, Chennai – 600 001. ... Respondents
Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.10.2017 and grant him the benefits of the fixed deposit benefits and savings bank account which was in the name of the mother of the petitioners Mrs. Vaikundavalli to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shyam Sunder For Respondents : Mr.N.Naganathan ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. Sankar
- respondent
UCO Bank Represented by its Branch Manager, Villianur Branch, Puducherry
- respondent
UCO Bank Represented by its Chief Manager, Chennai Head Office
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court