V.Punitha v. Government of Tamilnadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal permission. Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition accordingly, closing connected petitions.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the writ petition recorded; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.02.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.No.8742 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011
V.Punitha .... Petitioner
Vs
1.Government of Tamilnadu rep.by its Secretary
to Government, Department of Higher Education
Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board
4 th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Compound
College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
3.K.Hima Bindu
Assistant Professor,
Department of Commerce,
Government Arts College for Women,
Kumbakonam.
[Cause title amended as per order dated 23/9/2011 in
M.P.No.3/11 in W.P.8242 of 2011]
.... Respondents
For Petitioner :Mr.V.M.G.Ramakannan
For Respondents :Mr.P.Raja, Government Advocate-
for R1 & R2
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct the petitioner as selected and direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the appointment of the third respondent and appoint the petitioner as Assistant Professor in Commerce under MBC Category in the place of the third respondent.
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Punitha
- respondent
Government of Tamilnadu
- respondent
The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board
- respondent
K. Hima Bindu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court