Joema S.E v. Sarumathi R.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a Section 11 contempt petition alleging disobedience of a prior order. The respondent stated compliance, and the court recorded this representation.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.02.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.No.86 of 2019 Dr.S.E.Joema ... Petitioner Vs. Dr.R.Sarumathi, Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. ... Respondent
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience and violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.17560 of 2018 dated 12.07.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.Rose Radhi Jijo For Respondent : Mr.R.Raja
Government Advocate
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this contempt petition to punish the respondent for disobeying the orders of this Court in W.P.No.17560 of 2018 dated 12.07.2018.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr.S.E.Joema
- respondent
Dr.R.Sarumathi
Coram
V.Parthiban
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court