Petitioner failed to prosecute the writ petition after returning case papers to the petitioner over a month prior, leading to dismissal for non-prosecution.
Nulla
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.12.2019 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.8155 of 2017
R. Kannan
-vs-
The District Registrar (Admin), Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. .. Respondent
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to cancel the fraudulent sale deed document No.3337 of 2008 dated 23.06.2008 and also the lease agreement dated 16.07.2009 in document No. 3046 of 2009 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.02.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.R. Jayaprakash [Deleted]
For Respondent : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman
Government Advocate
******
ORDER
Mr.R.Jayaprakash, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that he has returned the papers to his client about the month back and given the change of vakalat also. The learned counsel also willing to file a memo to the said effect.
1/2
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS VIII)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
mp
To
The District Registrar (Admin),
Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.
W.P.No.8155 of 2017
aa21/01/2020
2/2
R. Kannan
The District Registrar (Admin), Saidapet, Chennai
T.S.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
