D.Nagarajan v. K.C.Kanagaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
This court accepted that the petitioner complied with directions regarding salary parity but closed the contempt petition, directing the petitioner to raise objections during the final hearing of the underlying writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with direction to petitioner to raise objections in the final hearing of the writ petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.630 of 2019
D.Nagarajan .. Petitioner
vs.
Mr.K.C.Kanagaraj
President, S273, Kadhiranallur
Primary Agricultural Cooperative Bank
Kadhiranallur, Namakkal District.
.. Respondent
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court dated 10.03.2016 made in W.M.P.No.2520 of 2016 in W.P.No.8865 of 2015.
For Petitioner : Ms.S.Girija
For Respondents : Mr.Balaramesh, Special Government Pleader Assisted by Mr.V.Prabhu, Govt.Advocate
O R D E R Heard Ms.S.Girija, learned counsel for the petitioner
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition filed for disobedience of this Court's order should be disposed of or remitted to the final hearing of the writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Nagarajan
- respondent
Mr.K.C.Kanagaraj
Coram
T.S. Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court