Allowed

Jayabalan, v. The Assistant Director of Mines

Madras HC11 Mar 2019WP/5820/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking release of a seized tractor and trailer. The vehicle had been seized for alleged illegal mining. The Court directed its release to the petitioner subject to specific conditions regarding deposits, bonds, and undertakings.

What did the court decide?

Release of the tractor and trailer subject to deposit of Rs.10,000, execution of a personal bond with two sureties, and furnishing of an undertaking not to use the vehicle for illegal activities.

Jayabalan, Vs The Assistant Director of Mines — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.03.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶2

W.P.No.5820 of 2019

¶3

Jayabalan .. Petitioner Vs.

¶4

The Assistant Director of Mines, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

¶5

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ponneri, Tiruvallur District.

¶6

The Inspector of Police, Gummidipoondi Police Station, Tiruvallur District. .. Respondents

¶7

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's *Tractor and Trailor bearing Registration No.TN.18 AY-4921 and TN-20 AK-4864 which was seized on 31.10.2018 by the first respondent and subsequently handed over to the third respondent herein.

¶8

For petitioner : Mr.K.S.Arumugam For respondents : Mr.J.Pothiraj, Spl.G.P.

¶9

ORDER

¶10

(The Order of the Court was made by R.Subbiah,J)

¶11

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's *Tractor and Trailor bearing Registration No.TN.18 AY-4921 and TN-20 AK4864 which was seized on 31.10.2018 by the first respondent and subsequently handed over to the third respondent herein.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

According to the petitioner, the respondents have seized the vehicle in question on 31.10.2018 on the ground of illegal mining and till date, no order for release of the said vehicle had been passed by the respondents. Hence, he has come forward with the present Writ Petition.

¶15

On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the vehicle in question was used for illegal transportation of mines and minerals like silica sand and there was no valid permit and hence the vehicle was seized. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous case.

¶16

In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the respondents from the date of seizure and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to rain and shine, it would certainly diminish its value, this Court is of the view that the vehicle in question may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner.

¶17

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii) :

¶18

(i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of *Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) before the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust as non-refundable deposit.

¶19

(ii) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate.

¶20

(iii) The petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondents/authority concerned stating that he/she will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondent(s) and also the trial Court, failing which the respondents/trial Court is/are at liberty to confiscate the vehicle.

¶21

(iv) The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned.

¶22

(v) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondent(s).

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

¶25

Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

Dated:15/03/2019
*Amended order as per
order dated 30/4/2019
in WMP No.13612 of 2019
in W.P.No.5820 of 2019
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
Dated:02/05/2019
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
cs
To
1. The Assistant Director of Mines, To be substituted as
Tiruvallur, per order already
Tiruvallur District. Despatched
on 19/03/2019
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Ponneri,
Tiruvallur District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Gummidipoondi Police Station,
Tiruvallur District.
+1cc to Mr.K.S.Arumugam , Advocate SR.No. 22747
W.P.No.5820 of 2019
A.SK(15/03/2019)
srg 3/5/2019

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Jayabalan, v. The Assistant Director of Mines

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayabalan, v. The Assistant Director of Mines

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhairagi Madam Trust, Vs the Inspector General of

Gangadurai Vs The District Collector

Moorthy Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

R.Narendran S/O. a.Rengarajan Vs The District Collector

Latha, Vs The District Collector

V.Valarmathi Vs The Sub Collector