In this writ petition filed under Article 226, the court was approached to quash a government circular and an order. The High Court dismissed the petition because the Government had already withdrawn the impugned circular, rendering the subject matter non-justiciable.
The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Writ Petition No.22993 of 2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the respondents pertaining to the Circular of the first respondent in Circular No.67, dated 03.11.2011 (C.No.52338/C1/2011) and the order passed by the second respondent in his proceeding in Pa.Mu.No.988/B1/2012, dated 04.07.2012 and quash the same.
For Petitioners: Mr.R.Krishnaswamy [P1] Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan [P2]
For Respondents: Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, Government Advocate [R1&R2] Mr.W.M.Abdul Majeed [R3] Mr.R.Krishanswamy [R4 to R7]
O R D E R [Order was delivered by R.SUBBIAH, J]
Petitioners have filed this Writ Petition seeking quash of Circular of the first respondent in Circular No.67, dated 03.11.2011 (C.No.52338/C1/2011) and the order passed by the second respondent in his proceeding in Pa.Mu.No.988/B1/2012, dated 04.07.2012.
In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Sub Assistant Registrar
Gm
To
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhairagi Madam Trust
Anuram Educational and Charitable Trust
Inspector General of Registration
District Registrar (Law)
Petitioners
R.Subbiah
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
