Dismissed

Integrated Bus Stand Traders v. the Govt of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Nov 2019WP/5632/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioner sought quashing of a specific order. Special Government Pleader submitted that action was taken to avoid traffic due to re-opening of a bus stand, leaving nothing for adjudication. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Integrated Bus Stand Traders Vs the Govt of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :07.11.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

W.P.No.5632 of 2003

¶6

and

¶7

W.M.P.Nos.7274 & 7275 of 2003 and 8596 of 2003 and 8982, 8983, 8984, 8985, 8986 and 8987 of 2003 and 8583, 8584 and 8585 of

¶8

2003 and

¶9

8953 of 2003

¶10

Intergrated Bus Stand Traders Association (Mattutha Vani)

¶11

rep. by its Secretary

¶12

I.Kamal, Madurai-20. ..Petitioner

¶13

¶14

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu

¶15

rep. by the Secretary Department of Municipal Admn.,

¶16

and Water Supplies,

¶17

Fort St. George, Chennai-9

¶18

2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai

¶19

3.The Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Alagar Koil Main road, Madurai. .. Respondents

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction in the nature of a Writ, calling for the records relating to the order of the 2^nd respondent in Lr.No.9290/A3/2003 dated 17.02.2003 and quash the same.

¶21

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Natarajan For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.N. Thambidurai Special Govt. Pleader For R3 : Mr.P.Srinivas

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

The petitioner filed by the Writ Petition seeking to quash records relating to the order of the 2^nd respondent in Lr.No.9290/A3/2003 dated 17.02.2003.

¶26

The learned Special Government Pleader submits that presently action has been taken to avoid traffic on account of re-opening of Palanganatham bus stand and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition.

¶27

In view of the said submission, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶28

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsn
To
1.The Secretary
Department of Municipal Admn.,
and Water Supplies,
Fort St. George, Chennai-9
2.The District Collector,
Madurai District,
Madurai
3.The Commissioner,
Madurai City Municipal Corporation,
Alagar Koil Main road,
Madurai
+1cc to Mr.P.Srinivas, Advocate SR.92849
+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.93044

¶29

W.P.No.5632 of 2003 and W.M.P.Nos.7274 & 7275 of 2003 and 8596 of 2003 and 8982,8983, 8984, 8985, 8986 and 8987 of 2003 and 8583, 8584 and 8585 of 2003 and 8953 of 2003

¶30

RR(CO) CB(30/12/2019)

¶31

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Integrated Bus Stand Traders v. the Govt of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Integrated Bus Stand Traders v. the Govt of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Alwarpet Benefit Fund Ltd. Vs the Inspector General of

K.Pugazhendhi Vs the Special Deputy Collector

V.Ramachandran, Vs the Principal Secretary

C.Uma Aananthi Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

R.Subhashini Vs Government of Tamilnadu

K.Shanmugam, Vs The Chief Educational Officer