Disposed

C.Uma Aananthi v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Nov 2019WP/16263/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus for grant of advance increments and consequent basic pay revision. The Court directed the authorities to consider the claim in light of relevant government orders and a prior Division Bench judgment within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners in light of relevant Government Orders and the Judgment of this Court within twelve weeks.

C.Uma Aananthi Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.11.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

W.P. No. 16263 of 2019
and
W.M.P. No. 15959 of 2019
1. C. Uma Ananthi
2. K. Sastha ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Represented by its Secretary,
Rural Department and Panchayat Raj Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai – 9.
2. The Director,
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet,
Chennai – 9.
3. The District Collector,
Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.
... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to
grant two advance increments to the Petitioners with effect from
the date of their acquiring P.G. Degree, ie., the date of the
last examinations of the P.G. Degree examinations or the date of
their joining the Department as the case may be whichever is
later and consequentially to revise the Petitioners basic pay
and further to pay the Petitioners all consequential arrears
within a fixed time frame.

¶6

For Petitioners : Mr. N. Subramaniyan For Respondents : Mr. A. N. Thambidurai Special Government Pleader

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

ORDER

¶9

This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioners seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents to two advance increments to the Petitioners with effect from the date of their acquiring P.G. Degree, i.e., the date of the last examinations of the P.G Degree examinations or the date of their joining the Department as the case may be whichever is later and consequentially to revise the Petitioners' basic pay and further to pay the Petitioners all consequential arrears that may be fixed by this Court.

¶10

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶11

The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners would submit that the issue involved in the Writ Petitions in regard to grant of advance increments, has been no longer res-integra by virtue of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P. (MD). No. 21875 of 2016, dated 19.05.2017.

¶12

In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the orders to consider the claim of the Petitioners in the light of the relevant Government Orders and the Judgment of this Court referred to supra, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶13

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶14

//True Copy//

¶15

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶16

¶17

The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Department and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St.George,

¶18

Chennai – 9.

¶19

The Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet,

¶20

Chennai – 9.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶23

+1cc to Mr.N.Subramaniyan, Advocate Sr.92581

¶24

+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.93045

¶25

W.P. No. 16263 of 2019
and
W.M.P. No. 15959 of 2019
mr[co]
srg 11/12/2019

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Uma Aananthi v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Uma Aananthi v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Alwarpet Benefit Fund Ltd. Vs the Inspector General of

K.Pugazhendhi Vs the Special Deputy Collector

V.Ramachandran, Vs the Principal Secretary

Integrated Bus Stand Traders Vs the Govt of Tamil Nadu

R.Subhashini Vs Government of Tamilnadu

K.Shanmugam, Vs The Chief Educational Officer