The single judge bench disposed of the writ petition filed for issue of mandamus praying payment of sum, holding that as the petitioner had already received the claimed amount, no further adjudication is needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :13.06.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 5184 of 2019
R.Madhusudhanan ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home, P & E Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Secretary, Department of law, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to pay the sum of Rs.49,995/- as per the representations of the petitioner dated 05.05.2017 and 21.01.2019 with simple interest within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr. T.Harihara Sudhan For Respondents: Mr. M.Karthikeyan Additional Government Pleader. O R D E R
The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the petitioner received a sum of Rs.49,955/- from the First Respondent, as claimed in the representations dated 05.05.2017 and 21.01.2019 made by him and he has made an endorsement in that effect, which is recorded. Nothing survives for further adjudication in the matter.
2.Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
vkr
To
W.P. No.5184 of 2019
MG (CO)
RRS(29/07/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Madhusudhanan
The Government of Tamilnadu
P.D.Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
