V.Rangarajan v. The General Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed three writ petitions seeking a mandatory injunction regarding subway construction at a level crossing as withdrawn by the petitioners.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :14.06.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. Nos. 4663 to 4665 of 2018 and W.M.P. Nos. 5761 to 5763 of 2018
V.Rangarajan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.4663 of 2018 P.Govindammal ... Petitioner in W.P.No.4664 of 2018 R.Dhanuprasanth ... Petitioner in W.P.No.4665 of 2018 Vs 1. The General Manager, Office of the General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003. 2. The Divisional Railway Manager, Office of the Divisional Railway Manager, DRM Complex, Southern Railway, Salem – 636 005. 3. The Senior Divisional Engineer/ ADRM (Works), Office of the Divisional Railway Manager, DRM Complex, Southern Railway, Salem – 636 005.
- The District Collector, District Collectorate, Salem – 636 001. ... Respondents in all WPs
Common Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the Respondents 1 to 3, from putting up a limited use Sub-way in the Level Crossing No.177 of Salem – Virudhachalam Railway route, under Salem Railway Division, contrary to the permanent Way Manual and the Guidelines governing the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Rangarajan
- petitioner
P.Govindammal
- petitioner
R.Dhanuprasanth
- respondent
General Manager, Southern Railway
- respondent
Divisional Railway Manager, Southern Railway
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court