Dismissed

Mrs. Kamala Subramanian v. Govt. of Tamilnadu

Madras HC6 Jun 2019WP/42946/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a writ petition seeking transfer of criminal complaints for investigation. The court held the petition became infructuous as the seven respondent had admitted the underlying incident was treated as a civil dispute and the complaint was closed, with civil suits pending.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed as infructuous and connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Mrs. Kamala Subramanian Vs Govt. of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 06.06.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

W.P.No.42946 of 2006, M.P.Nos.1 to 5 of 2006

¶6

and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2007

¶7

Kamala Subramanian ...Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1. Government of Tamil Nadu, by its Home Secretary,

¶10

Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶11

The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

¶12

The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

¶13

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai 8.

¶14

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Katchery Road, Mylapore, Chennai 4.

¶15

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Teynampet, Chennai.

¶16

The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), Abiramapuram Police Station, Chennai.

¶17

The Inspector of Police, Traffic Investigation, Anna Square, Chennai.

¶18

The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), F-2 Police Station, Egmore, Chennai.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

The Superintendent of Police, CBCID Wing, Chennai.

¶21

The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Incharge 5th Main Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai.

¶22

Gauthamchand Dhoka 13. Mahaveerchand Dhoka 14. Mittalal Dhoka 15. Rikhabchand Dhoka ..Respondents

¶23

Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Mandamus to transfer of all the complaints dated 28.06.2005, 16.07.2006, 20.07.2006, 21.07.2006, 12.08.2006, 24.10.2006, 25.10.2006 and 02.11.2006 pending before the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth respondents to the tenth respondent and investigate the same.

¶24

For Petitioner: No Appearance
For Respondents: Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, AGP, for RR1 to 10
R11 - No Appearance
Mr.M.Santhanaraman, for RR13 to 15
Mr.D.Dharamchand Jain, for R12
ORDER

¶25

This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to transfer all the complaints dated 28.06.2005, 16.07.2006, 20.07.2006, 21.07.2006, 12.08.2006, 24.10.2006, 25.10.2006 and 02.11.2006 pending before the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth respondents to the tenth respondent for further investigation.

¶26

The seventh respondent filed a counter affidavit stating that on 16.07.2006, one Sri Mahaveera Chand Dhoka, the 13th respondent herein lodged a complaint, which was registered in 238/CSR/E4/06. Based on the complaint, the petitioner herein and her husband viz., Sri Subramaian were enquired into and the complaint was closed. Thereafter, the petitioner and her husband sent complaints through Telegram as well as written complaint to various Police officials for the same incident.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

It is further stated that the said complaints were enquired into by the respondents and they were found to be of civil dispute. After filing the CSR, the petitioner herein has approached the Civil Court and the suits are pending.

¶29

In the light of the counter affidavit filed by the seventh respondent, the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶30

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. Home Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Home Department, Fort St. George,
Chennai 600 009.

¶31

The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

¶32

The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

¶33

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai 8.

¶34

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Katchery Road, Mylapore, Chennai 4.

¶35

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Teynampet, Chennai.

¶36

The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), Abiramapuram Police Station, Chennai.

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

The Inspector of Police, Traffic Investigation, Anna Square, Chennai.

¶39

The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), F-2 Police Station, Egmore, Chennai.

¶40

The Superintendent of Police, CBCID Wing, Chennai.

¶41

The Assistant Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Incharge 5th Main Road,
Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai.
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.45836
W.P.No.42946 of 2006
pa[co]
srg 19/07/2019

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs. Kamala Subramanian v. Govt. of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Kamala Subramanian v. Govt. of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tmt. Sakunthala S.D. Vs the Managing Director

K.K.Sivakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Sathyamoorthy Vs Special Commissioner and

M/S Universal Granite Vs the Chairman and Managing

M/S. Manickam Agency Vs the Director

R.Swarood Vs Union of India, Rep. by Its