Dismissed

R.Swarood v. Union of India, Rep. by Its

Madras HC6 Jun 2019WP/18332/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to regularize his practice of modern medicine. On the basis of the petitioner's counsel's request and endorsement, the court dismissed the writ petition along with connected miscellaneous petitions as withdrawn. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

R.Swarood Vs Union of India, Rep. by Its — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 06.06.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

W.P.No.18332 of 2009

¶6

and M.P.Nos.1 of 2009 and 1 of 2010

¶7

R.Swaroop .. Petitioner

¶8

vs 1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of Health, New Delhi. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to State, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 3. The Director General of Police, Kamaraj Salai, Chennai 600 004. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. .. Respondents

¶9

Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to regularize the Petitioners' Medicinal Practice in Modern Medicine (Allopathy System) and further forbear the respondents from enforcing the Penal Provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 as against the petitioner in particular.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ashok For Respondents : Mr.J.Madanagopal, CGSC, for R1 Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Spl.G.P., for RR2 to 4

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶14

In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶15

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Insp.Cell)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
1. The Secretary to Government,
Union of India
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Department of Health,New Delhi.
2. The Secretary to State,
The State of Tamil Nadu,
Health and Family Welfare Department,
Fort St. George,Chennai 600 009.
3. The Director General of Police,
Kamaraj Salai,Chennai 600 004.
4. The Superintendent of Police,
Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.
+1 cc to M/s.J.Madanagopal, Advocate, Sr.No. 45628
+1 cc to The Government Pleader, Sr.No. 45829
W.P.No.18332 of 2009
CSL/11.07.2019

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Swarood v. Union of India, Rep. by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Swarood v. Union of India, Rep. by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tmt. Sakunthala S.D. Vs the Managing Director

K.K.Sivakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Sathyamoorthy Vs Special Commissioner and

M/S Universal Granite Vs the Chairman and Managing

M/S. Manickam Agency Vs the Director

Mrs. Kamala Subramanian Vs Govt. of Tamilnadu