S.Sridhar v. Designated Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to quash suspension of food license but abandoned the Writ Petition in court, resulting in dismissal as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted; petition dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :10.06.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No.4290 of 2018
and
WMP. Nos.5278 & 5279 of 2018
S.Sridhar ..Petitioner
vs 1.Designated Officer, District Food Safety and Drug Administration Office, Salem – 636 001. 2. Food Safety and Standard Authority of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Department, Kotla Road, FDA Bhavan, New Delhi – 110 002. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the record of the 1st respondent in Form III dated 07.02.2018 and quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to recall the order of suspension of license in Na.Ka.No.254/A1/F.S.P.S/2018, dated 08.02.2018. For Petitioner : Mr. G.Surya Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.M.Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader for R1
Mr.J.Madhanagopalrao,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Sridhar
- respondent
Designated Officer, District Food Safety and Drug Administration Office, Salem
- respondent
Food Safety and Standard Authority of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court