Dismissed

Agility Logistics Pvt.Ltd., v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC10 Jun 2019WP/3382/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a directive to pass orders on a representation regarding the release of a Gift Deed. The court held the petition infructuous due to an endorsement to that effect made by counsel and dismissed the writ.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs to either party.

Agility Logistics Pvt.Ltd., Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :10.06.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P. No. 3382 of 2018

¶6

Agility Logistics Private Limited
Represented by its Vice President
Mr.Anandhan Srinivasan
having Registered officeat
Polaris, A-501/502. 'B' Wing
Fifth Floor, Off Marol Maroshi Road
Andheri (E), Mumbai – 400 059.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Revenue Officer (Stamps) Chennai
Collectorate of Chennai
Singaravelar Maligai
No.32, Rajaji Salai
Chennai – 600 001.
2.The Sub-Registrar
O/o. The Sub -Registrar
Ponneri, Thiruvallur District. ... Respondents

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the District Officer (Stamps) Chennai, Singaravelar Maligai, No.32, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001, the First Respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation/explanation dated 11.07.2017 regarding the release of the Gift Deed registered as document Number 8545/2016 dated 14.09.2016 at the office of the Sub-Registrar, Ponneri, Thiruvallur District.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.A.R.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman Government Advocate

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

Mr.A.R.Suresh, Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayers sought for in this writ petition by the petitioner has become infructuous and also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶12

2.In view of the submission and also the endorsement made in the Writ Petition, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

¶13

Sd/-

¶14

Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶15

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
maya
To
1.The District Revenue Officer (Stamps) Chennai
Collectorate of Chennai
Singaravelar Maligai
No.32, Rajaji Salai
Chennai – 600 001.
2.The Sub-Registrar
O/o. The Sub -Registrar
Ponneri, Thiruvallur District.
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 47521
W.P. No. 3382 of 2018
rr (CO)
A.SK(10/07/2019)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Agility Logistics Pvt.Ltd., v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Agility Logistics Pvt.Ltd., v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

M.Javid Ali Vs The District Collector

M/s.v.K.Fincap Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Regional Director

J.Jayeshchand Vs The District Collector

B.Soosairaj, Vs Union of India

M/s.Gold Star Recreation Club, Vs The Commissioner of Police

S.Sridhar Vs Designated Officer