High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 regarding land acquisition and state department notices due to the non-appearance of petitioners. The petitions were closed for non-prosecution without a ruling on costs.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 24-01-2019 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.39335 of 2003, 2822 of 2002 and WP.MP.Nos.3839, 3840 of 2004,47593 of 2003,
WP.No.39335 of 2003
WP.No.2822 of 2002 1. Tmt.Indirani Evalappan 2. Dr.P.E.Somasundaram 3. Dr.Suganya Somasundaram 4. Dr.P.E.Sathish ... Petitioners Petitioners 1 to 4 impleaded as per order of Court dated 29.04.2002 in WPMP No.14922 of 2002 ..Vs.. 1. Chennai Telephones (South West), rep.by its Deputy General Manager, Panagal buildings, No.1, Jeones Road, Chennai-15.
.. Respondents in WP.No.39335 of 2003
Prayer in WP.No.39335 of 2003 : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent relating to his letter dated 28.11.2003 in Na.ka.9119/94/A3 and quash the same with a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass an award under Section 12 of the Land Acquisition Act (Central Act) after permitting the petitioner to take part in the enquiry under Section 9(3) and 10 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894, i.e. (Central Act), in the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.9119/94/A3 dated 28.11.2003.
Prayer in WP.No.2822 of 2002 : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to the G.O.Ms.No.1357 (Public) Telephone-2) dated 11.12.2001 and in respect of the land in S.No.65/1 and 65/2 situate in Porur village, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvellore district measuring 0.48.5 hectares.
WP No.39335/2003 For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent 1 : Mr.K.Sridhar For Respondent 2 : Mr.M.Elumalai, Government Advocate WP No.2822 of 2002 For Petitioner : No Appearance For RR1, 3 & 4 : Mr.M.Elumalai For R 2 : Mr.K.Sridhar ,
The writ petitions were listed for hearing on 18.01.2019. None appeared for the writ petitioners. Thus, the cases were directed to be listed on 21.01.2019 under the caption “For Dismissal”.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pkn
To
1. The Deputy Secretary,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Public Department,
(Telephones), Fort St.George,Chennai-9.
2. Chennai Telephones (South West),
rep.by its Deputy General Manager,
Panagal buildings,
No.1, Jeones Road, Chennai-15.
3. Revenue Divisional Officer,
Ponneri Taluk, Ponneri,
Thiruvallore District.
4. Tahsildar,
Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallore District.
+1cc to Government Pleader,High Court, Madras SR.No.6065
W.P.Nos.39335 of 2003, 2822 of 2002
MR(CO)
GMY(18/03/2019)
Tmt. Indirani Evalappan
Chennai Telephones (South West)
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
