M/S Sri Venkateswara & Co. v. the Revenue Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras permitted the writ petitioner to withdraw the petition challenging the levy of timber tax, recording the withdrawal.
The High Court of Madras permitted the writ petitioner to withdraw the petition challenging the levy of timber tax, recording the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :24.01.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.12295 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.No.14369 of 2004 M/s.Sri.Venkateswara & Co. Rep.by its Partner A.Thirumalaikumar No.55-A-2, Railway Feeder Road Tenkasi Tirunelveli District. ..Petitioner vs The Revenue Officer Corporation of Chennai Chennai – 600 003. .. Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondent from levying and collecting timber tax or at the increase rate of timber tax of Rs.50/- per metric ton for the timber logs brought into the city by the petitioner in the course of transits to its stock Yard at Madavaram, Thiruvallur District and/or factory at Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District both of which are outside the city by directly removing out of the city viz., Chennai Fort Trust by rail, road of water.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Soundararajan
For Respondent : Mr.T.C.Gopalakrishnan
2
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
kak
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and this Court has granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the same, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is also closed.
24.01.2019
kak
Internet:Yes/No
To
The Revenue Officer
Corporation of Chennai
Chennai – 600 003.
W.P.No.12295 of 2004
M/s.Sri.Venkateswara & Co.
The Revenue Officer Corporation of Chennai
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court