Writ petition filed under Article 226 praying to reduce temple entry charges was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was made by the petitioner on the day of hearing.
None; the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.09.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P. No.39217 of 2003
A. Krishnamachari
S/o. Ananthachari ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments,
117, Nungambakkam High Road,
Chennai 600 034.
2. The Executive Officer (Joint Commissioner)
Arul Migu Ranganatha Swamy Devasthanam,
Srirangam, Trichy 620 006. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from raising the charges for entry into santhanu mandapam and kili mandapam on Vaikunda Ekadesi Day at Sri Renganathaswamy Temple from Rs.150 to Rs.1000/- and Rs.75 to Rs.200 respectively. and quash the same.
O R D E R
When the above Writ Petition was posted for hearing on 16.09.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today “for dismissal”. Even today, (18.09.2019) there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the counsel on record. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CJ Conf.,)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrp
To
1. The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments,
117, Nungambakkam High Road,
Chennai 600 034.
2. The Executive Officer (Joint Commissioner)
Arul Migu Ranganatha Swamy Devasthanam,
Srirangam, Trichy 620 006.
+1 cc to M/s.P.Valliappan, Advocate, S.R.No.80569
+1 cc to M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, Advocate, S.R.No.80614
+1 cc to the Special Government Pleader(HR & CE), S.R.No.81244
W.P. No.39217 of 2003
LN(CO)
SSM(04/11/2019)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in the absence of the petitioner for hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Krishnamachari
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
The Executive Officer (Joint Commissioner) Arul Migu Ranganatha Swamy Devasthanam
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
