Dismissed
N.Rajendran v. the District Superintendent
Madras HCWP/3830/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:04.02.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.No.3830 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
N.Rajendran .. Petitioner
vs.
1.The District Superintendent of Police, Erode District.
2.Mr.Jaganathan ..Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to take appropriate departmental action against the 2nd respondent in view of the complaint dated 11.11.2010 given by the petitioner under Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 and other appropriate Rules and regulations.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh,A.G.P.for R1 R2 No appearance
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication.
2.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed. msk
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
W.P.No.3830 of 2011
Kak(14/03/2019)
N.Rajendran
1.The District Superintendent of Police, Erode District
2.Mr.Jaganathan
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court