R.Natarajan v. the Director of Khadi&Village
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.11.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.NOS.37324 & 37325 OF 2004 AND W.P.M.P.NOS.44786 & 44787 OF 2004
R.Natarajan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.37324 of 2004 K.Gomathi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.37325 of 2004
Vs.
Common Prayer :
Writ Petitions in W.P.Nos.37324 and 37325 of 2004 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writs of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,55,949.05 and Rs.1,03,288.35, respectively, being the retirement benefits to the petitioner payable by the 2nd respondent with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of eligibility upto actual payment.
For Petitioner : Ms.Abirami for Mr.G.Ethirajulu in both writ petitions For Respondents : Mr.S.Srinivasan in both writ petitions
C O M M O N O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions and also made endorsements to that effect.
2.In view of the endorsements made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mkn
To
The Director of Khadi & Village Industries, No.236, Avvai Shnmugam Salai, Gopalapuram, Chennai – 86.
W.P.Nos.37324 & 37325 of 2004
PA(CO) CS/30/12/2019
R.Natarajan
K.Gomathi
The Director of Khadi & Village Industries
The Pulaimpatti Sarvodaya Sangam
M.Duraismamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court