Petitioner sought revision under Section 115 CPC against a decree. Finding the relief infructuous, the Court dismissed the petition and closed the connected petition without costs.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.11.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.2705 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
Thirunavukkarasu ... Petitioner/Respondent/Defendant
Vs.
1.Usha Sangamitra 2.Minor Praveen ... Respondents/Petitioners/Plaintiffs minor rep by guardian mother Usha Sangamitra
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the fair and decreetal order passed by the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli dated 07.07.2010 in E.P.No.707 of 2008 in O.S.No.79 of 2004. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Anand For Respondents : not ready in notice O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli.
+1 cc to M/s.V.Anand,Advocate Sr.No. 96419 AKM/16.12.19/1P-3C / C.R.P.No.2705 of 2010
and M.P.No.1 of 2010
Page 1/1
Thirunavukkarasu
Usha Sangamitra
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
