The petitioner, a trust, sought recognition under section 80G via a writ petition filed under Article 226. The petition was unopposed due to the petitioner's non-appearance. The Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of prosecution on 03.01.2019.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.01.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.37229 of 2006 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2006
M/s.Sri Agathiar Gnana Peedam, represented by its Managing Trustee, T.K.Thangarajan, Agathiar Vanam, Thooripalayam, Kallar-641 305. ... Petitioner Vs
1.Commissioner of Income-Tax,III(I/C) No63. Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 018.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in C.No.327(344)/05-06/CIT-III/CBE quash the impugned proceedings dated 21/08/2006 and further direct the first respondent to grant the recognition under section 80G of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 as requested by the petitioner.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents: Mr.A.P.Srinivas & Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap
When the writ petition was taken for hearing on 02.01.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter is posted today, i.e. on 03.01.2019, under the caption “For Dismissal”.
petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS viii)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
tar/ssb
To
+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 656
W.P.No.37229 of 2006
and
M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2006
A.SK(08/02/2019)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed or dismissed due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Sri Agathiar Gnana Peedam, represented by T.K. Thangarajan
Commissioner of Income-Tax,III(I/C) No63.
Income-Tax Officer, Ward V (1) Coimbatore
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
