also obtained No objection certificate from the respondents 1 and 2 for getting metro water, and drainage connection, and electricity connection, he has been continuously enjoying the above said plot. After payment of entire cost, the petitioner has approached the respondents 1 and 2 to execute the sale deed in his favour, but the 2nd respondent did not come forward to execute the same. In the meantime, the 3rd respondent herein illegally trespassed into the property and occupied the plot. The petitioner has lodged a police complaint against the 3rd respondent, and the petitioner has also filed a suit against the 3rd respondent in O.S.No.1050 of 1997 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvottiyur, seeking a direction to execute the sale deed. But, the suit has been dismissed on the ground that, since the sale deed was not executed in his favour by the Board, the title is not passed on the petitioner, and the petitioner cannot maintain a suit for declaration of title. Now, the 2nd respondent has passed the impugned order on the ground that the petitioner is not entitled for the plot allotted to him as he has permitted the third party to occupy the plot, which is violation of the allotment order, and the petitioner is not entitled to seek for execution of sale deed. It is further stated that the respondents 1 and 2 will take steps to cancel the order of allotment issued in favour of the petitioner. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
