The High Court dismissed two writ petitions as infructuous, noting that the relief sought had become moot, but granted liberty to challenge the impugned order to protect future legal rights.
Liberty granted to challenge the impugned order in the manner known to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.10.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P.s 22124 & 22125 of 2005
and
W.P.M.P.s 24104 & 24105 of 2005
M/s. Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd.,
rep. by its Company Secretary,
Periya Naickenpalayam,
Coimbatore-641 020. ... Petitioner in both
W.P.s
Versus
1. K.Panneerselvam,
C-39, Kaveri Nagar,
Kulithalai,
Trichy District.
2. The President,
The Indian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry,
Chamber Towers,
8/732, Avinashi Road,
Coimbatore.
3. Y.C.Balashanmugham,
Advocate.
No.26/1, Panchali Amman Koil Street,
Arumbakkam,
Chennai-600 106.
4. The Registrar General,
High Court, Chennai.
5. Hon'ble Justice S.Rathnavel Pandian,
Retired Judge, Supreme Court. ... Respondents in
both W.P.s
PRAYER in W.P. 22124 OF 2005 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the
1
Hon'ble 4th respondent pertaining to the order dated 26.03.2004 in O.P. 232 of 2000 and quash the same.
PRAYER in W.P. 22125 OF 2005 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Hon'ble 4th respondent pertaining to the order dated 26.03.2004 in O.P. 231 of 2000 and quash the same.
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted
that the prayer sought for by the petitioner in these Writ
Petitions have become infructuous and a liberty may be granted
to the petitioner to challenge the order impugned in these Writ
Petitions.
Recording the submission made by the learned Counsel
appearing for the Petitioner, the Writ Petitions are dismissed
as infructuous and a liberty is granted to the petitioner to
challenge the order impugned in these Writ Petitions in the
manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ
Petition Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rpp
To
1. The President,
The Indian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry,
Chamber Towers,
8/732, Avinashi Road,
Coimbatore.
2. The Registrar General,
High Court, Chennai.
2
+1cc to Mr.Anirudhkrishnan, Advocate SR.85757 +1cc to Mr.Anirudhkrishnan, Advocate SR.85757(13/11/2019)
W.P.s 22124 & 22125 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.s 24104 & 24105 of 2005
Rgn(CO) CB(11/11/2019) CB(13/11/2019)
3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd.
K.Panneerselvam
The President, The Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Y.C.Balashanmugham
The Registrar General, High Court, Chennai
Hon'ble Justice S.Rathnavel Pandian
V.BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
