High Court dismissed five writ petitions filed under Article 226 for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear or provide representation on the hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.07.2019
CORAM :
The Hon'ble Mrs.VIJAYA.K.TAHILRAMANI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P. Nos.35766 to 35771 of 2005
S.Shanmugam .. Petitioner in WP.35766/05 Dharmalingam .. Petitioner in WP.35767/05 N.Selvakumar .. Petitioner in WP.35768/05 A.Kandasamy .. Petitioner in WP.35769/05 Angamuthu Gounder .. Petitioner in WP.35770/05 M.Shanmugam .. Petitioner in WP.35771/05 -vs1.State of Tamilnadu, rep. by District Collector, Coimbatore District. 2.State of Tamilnadu, rep. by Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirupur. 3.State of Tamilnadu, rep. by Tahsildar, Palladam, Coimbatore District. .. Respondents in all WPs. Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records of the 3rd respondent pertaining to the notice u/s.6 of Tamilnadu Land Encroachment Act, No.3 of 1905 dt.21.10.2005 pertaining to the petitioners' land in S.No.259/7, wrongly given (actual 259/1) and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property by the petitioner.
For Petitioners : No appearance in all WPs For Respondents : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy in all WPs Govt. Advocate * * * * *
O R D E R
(ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE)
There is no representation for the petitioners. So also, on the last date, i.e., 16.07.2019, there was no representation for the petitioners.
2.In the order dated 02.07.2019, it is recorded that in spite of writing letters through registered post to the petitioners, the learned counsel for the petitioners has not received any instructions, hence, he reported no instructions and therefore, the names of the petitioners be printed in the cause list on the next date, i.e., 16.07.2019. It is reflected in the order dated 16.07.2019 that there was no representation for the petitioners, hence, the matters be posted for dismissal on 26.07.2019, i.e., today.
3.As stated earlier, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sra To 1.The District Collector, Coimbatore District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirupur. 3.The Tahsildar, Palladam, Coimbatore District. +1cc to Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil, Advocate, S.R.No.65008 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.64254
W.P.Nos.35766 to 35771 of 2005 NMI(CO)
RRS(29/08/2019)
S.Shanmugam et al.
State of Tamilnadu
VIJAYA.K.TAHILRAMANI
M.DURAISWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
