On a bare perusal of the same, it is evident that it is only the marks secured by the candidates in the Bachelor's Degree Course that would be relevant, as contended by the Respondent, and on the contrary, there is nothing even to infer therefrom that the marks obtained by them in any Post Graduation Course could be considered, as sought by the Petitioner. It is trite law that the conditions mentioned in the prospectus issued by the Educational Institution for admission of candidates for the course of study is sacrosanct and binds all concerned. In any event, it is also not the case of the Petitioner that resorting to selection on the basis of marks in the Bachelor's Degree Course would amount to any discrimination or unreasonableness or arbitrary action vitiating the admission process. It is equally settled legal position that even when two or more views are possible, the High Court exercising powers of Judicial Review under Article 226 of the Constitution, is only concerned with the decision-making process and cannot substitute the decision of the Educational Experts suggesting some other course of action to be adopted and that too, just to suit the convenience of one who would not otherwise get selected, when the declared norms are applied. It is needless to point out here that such deviation, if accepted, would only result in disrupting the
