Disposed

S.Govinthan v. The District Collector

Madras HC16 Dec 2019WP/32926/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of a writ petition filed for demarcation of property. The court noted that the Petitioner's representation for Patta issuance had been rejected by an order dated 05.12.2019, rendering further consideration unnecessary and directing the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedy elsewhere.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded, directing the petitioner to approach the proper forum for necessary relief since the underlying Patta representation was rejected.

S.Govinthan Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.12.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P. No. 32926 of 2019

¶6

S.Govinthan ... Petitioner

¶7

-vs-

¶8

1. The District Collector, Master Plan Complex, Villupuram District. 2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram District. 3.The Revenue Inspector, Office of the Revenue Inspector, Ariyalur firka, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram District. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Office of the Revenue Inspector, Ariyalur firka, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram District. 5. Mayajothi 6. Deventhiran 7. Lakshmi ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second and Third Respondents to demarcate and subdivision of the Petitioner's property, bearing Patta Number 360, Survey Number 64/A1, Total extent of 0.34 Cents in 1.03 Acre (0.41.5 Ars) situated in the Athiyur Village, SRO at Sankarapuram, Villupuram District on the assistance of the

¶9

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

Fourth Respondent on the basis of the Petitioner's Land Demarcataion and Sub-division application dated 26.11.2018 and the Petitioner's representation dated 25.02.2019.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. J. Agni Selvaraju

¶13

For Respondents: Mr. R. Venkatesh, Government Advocate (for R1 to R4)

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Learned Government Advocate appearing for the First to Fourth Respondents submits that the representation dated 25.02.2019 made by the Petitioner for issuance of Patta has been considered and rejected by Order dated 05.12.2019, and a copy of the same shall be produced and Learned Counsel for the Petitioner acknowledges its receipt. Nothing remains for further consideration in this Writ Petition.

¶16

Recording the subsequent events, the Writ Petition is disposed. If the Petitioner is still aggrieved, it is open to him to workout his remedy for necessary relief before the proper forum in the matter recognized by law. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssi/arb To 1. The District Collector, Master Plan Complex, Villupuram District. 2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram District. 3.The Revenue Inspector, Office of the Revenue Inspector, Ariyalur firka, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶17

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

The Village Administrative Officer, Office of the Revenue Inspector, Ariyalur firka, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶20

+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.104893

¶21

W.P. No. 32926 of 2019

¶22

MP(CO) CB(03/02/2020)

¶23

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Govinthan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Govinthan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Duraisamy Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

D.Sumathi Vs The District Collector

K.Nandhagopal Vs The District Collector

Dhanalakshmi Vs The Sub Registrar

S.Nithyanandam, Vs The Commissioner

Raja.C Vs The Registrar