The Madras High Court dismissed a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 seeking directions to municipal officers to take action against a fourth respondent. The Petitioner was granted liberty to withdraw, having admitted that grievances were not covered by the cited enactments.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.12.2019
C O R A M
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 30745 of 2019
M.Ramesh ... Petitioner Vs.
For Petitioner : Mr. S. Sivaraman For Respondents: Mrs. Karthika Ashok Standing Counsel (For R1 to R3) O R D E R
The Writ Petition had been filed seeking direction to the First to Third Respondents to take action against the Fourth Respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 and the Public Health Act, 1929, for which he has made a representation dated 26.08.2019.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssi/arb
To
1. The Zonal Officer,
Zone-X, Corporation of Chennai,
No.62, NSK Salai,
Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024.
2. The Health Officer,
Zone-X, Corporation of Chennai,
No.62, NSK Salai,
Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024.
3. Assistant Review Officer,
Zone-X, Corporation of Chennai,
No.62, NSK Salai,
Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024.
W.P. No. 30745 of 2019 SSD(CO) GN(03/01/2020)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition challenging non-action under municipal and public health laws should be dismissed as withdrawn since grievances fell within other competent forums?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
M.Ramesh
The Zonal Officer
The Health Officer
Assistant Review Officer
K.Senthil kumar
P.D. Audikeshavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
