Bench disposed of writ petition concerning bus ply rights. Counsel withdrew the petition as infructuous. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous with no order as to costs.
Dismissal of Writ Petition as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.288 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.Nos.291 of 2004 & 7831 of 2006 and W.V.M.P.No. 566 of 2006
Tmt.M.Ushadevi ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Regional Transport Authority,
and the District Collector,
Coimbatore.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents herein from interfering in plying the petitioner's bus bearing Regn.No.TN/33/S.4569 plying on the route Dharapuram to Coimbatore Gandhipuram Bus stand (Via) Nanjiampalayam, Suriyanallur, Kundadam, Palladam, Lakshmi Mills, Sulur, Ondipudur and Singanallur
without terminating at Singanallur Bus stand.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Palanisamy For Respondents : M/s.K.Bhuvaneswari, AGP
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made an endorsement to withdraw the Writ Petition as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tmt.M.Ushadevi
The Regional Transport Authority, and the District Collector, Coimbatore
The Regional Transport Officer, Coimbatore South
The Regional Transport Authority, and the District Collector, Erode
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Erode
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Traffic Coimbatore City Police
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
