Dismissed

G.Srinivasan v. the Assistant Executive Engi-

Madras HC2 Aug 2019WP/24748/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought to quash proceedings and seek forbearance regarding electricity disconnection. The petition was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners with court permission. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

G.Srinivasan Vs the Assistant Executive Engi- — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 02.08.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

W.P.No.24748 of 2003 and W.M.P.Nos.30424, 30425 & 30426 of 2003 1. G.Srinivasan 2. M.Loghanathan 3. Nanjappa Gounder 4. Muthusamy 5. Devaraj 6. Natarajan 7. Muthusamy Gounder 8. Pattae Gounder 9. S.Palanisamy 10.A.A.Chinnasamy 11.K.Rathinasamy 12.Sivagami 13.V.P.Sivasubramaniam 14.K.P.Shamugam 15.K.K.Muthusamy 16.Logamoorthy 17.Karpa Gounder 18.Muthusamy Gounder 19.Karuppa Gounder 20.Subramaniam 21.A.R.Sukkarappan 22.K.Chinnasamy 23.Palani Gounder 24.N.Kumarasamy 25.K.Chinnasamy ... Petitioners Vs. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Maintenance and Operation Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle Sathyamangalam-638 402, Erode District. ... Respondents Prayer:The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the

¶6

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶7

Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent made in its proceedings made in Ka.No.U.Se.Po/Vini/May/Sathi/No.05, 29, 02, 20,01, 24, 09, 11, 13, 22, 29, 10, 18, 12, 17, 20, 14, 24, 26,21, 16, 07, 28, 08, 07, dated 29.07.2003 in so far as the petitioners 1 to 25 respectively are concerned and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondent from disconnecting the Electricity Service Connection to the petitioners herein pursuant to the above said proceedings.

¶8

For Petitioners : Ms.A.S.Anandavalli for
Mr.S.Silambanan
For Respondents : Mr.S.K.Rameshwar
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks
permission of this court to withdraw this petition and she has
also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kal
To
The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Maintenance and Operation
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle
Sathyamangalam-638 402,
Erode District.
W.P.No.24748 of 2003
and
W.M.P.Nos.30424, 30425 & 30426 of 2003
KS(CO)
CS/19/09/2019

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Srinivasan v. the Assistant Executive Engi-

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Srinivasan v. the Assistant Executive Engi-

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Punniakodi Vs the Special Commissioner and

Shanmugha Arts,Science Vs Union of India Rep.by Secrty.

Sathyabama Institute of Vs Union of India Rep.by Its

A.K.Perumal Samy Vs the Assistant Executive Engi-

A.M.Chinnarajan Vs the Assistant Executive Engi-

Vanaja Subramaniam Vs the Commissioner