Writ petition filed urging authorities to consider representations regarding encroachment was dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear on the court date or earlier postings, resulting in dismissal for non-prosecution.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.04.2019
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P. No.28395 of 2018
C.Saroja .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The District Collector,
Collectorate, Salem District.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Collectorate, Salem District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Attur Taluk & Post, Salem District.
4.The Tahsildar,
Attur Taluk & Post, Salem District.
5.Pachamuthu
6.Muthammal .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the
respondents 1 to 4 to consider the representation dated
25.07.2018, and reminder representation dated 22.09.2018
submitted by the petitioner in the light of G.O.Ms.540, Revenue
((LD6 (2)) Dept., dated 04.12.2014 and to remove the
encroachment made by the 5 th & 6 th respondents which is situated
in S.Nos.203, 204 situated in Thenkumarai Village, Attur Taluk,
Salem District, within a time frame as may be fixed by this
Court.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.S.Kamalesh Kannan
Govt. Advocate for RR 1 to 4
: Mr.A.Arunbabu for RR 5 and 6
* * * * *
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
There is no representation for the petitioner. So also, on the earlier two dates, i.e., on 22.04.2019 and 02.04.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner.
2.In the order dated 22.04.2019, it is reflected that there was no representation on that date, so also on the earlier date, i.e., 02.04.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was posted for dismissal on 23.04.2019, i.e., today.
3.As stated earlier, today also, there is no appearance for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sra To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Salem District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Attur Taluk & Post, Salem District. 4.The Tahsildar, Attur Taluk & Post, Salem District. +1cc to Mr.A.Arun Babu, Advocate, S.R.No.38738 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.39368
W.P.No.28395 of 2018 SVF(CO)
RRS(18/06/2019)
C. Saroja
The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem District
The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Salem District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Attur Taluk & Post, Salem District
The Tahsildar, Attur Taluk & Post, Salem District
Pachamuthu
V.K. Tahilramani
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
