C.R.Kannan v. v.K.Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed three Civil Revision Petitions as infructuous because the witness whose deposition was before the trial court had died, rendering the relief sought impossible to grant.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.(PD)Nos.3869 to 3871 of 2013&
M.P. Nos.1 of 2013 ( 3 MPs)
C.R.Kannan ... Petitioner in all CRPs
v.
V.K.Suresh ... Respondent in C.R.P.No.3869/2013
V.K.Ramprasad ... Respondent in C.R.P.No.3870/2013
V.K.Sridhar ... Respondent in C.R.P.No.3871/2013
C.R.P.(PD)No.3869/2013 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 07.08.2013 passed in I.A.No.6127 of 2013 in O.S.No.6701 of 1996 on the file of the VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
C.R.P.(PD)No.3870/2013 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227
2
of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 07.08.2013 passed in I.A.No.6128 of 2013 in O.S.No.6923 of 1996 on the file of the VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.R.Kannan
- respondent
V.K.Suresh
- respondent
V.K.Ramprasad
- respondent
V.K.Sridhar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court