Dismissed

Vijaya v. The Director of Publice Health

Madras HC17 Sept 2019WP/27507/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by an ST woman against health authority respondents challenging rejection of her compassionate appointment claim based on her husband being a daily wager. Court directed petitioner to submit representation for either employment or appointment. Petition dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit representation within two weeks; respondents to consider it and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

Vijaya Vs The Director of Publice Health — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED :17.09.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

W.P.No.27507 of 2019

Vijaya

..Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine D.M.S. Compound Teynampet, Chennai-600 006.

¶11

2.The Deputy Director of Health Services Perambalur District Perambalur-612 212.

¶12

3.The Block Medical Officer Primary Health Centre Valikandapuram Perambalur District. .. Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pertaining to the proceedings of the 2^nd respondent in Na.Ka.EN:212/A2/2019, dated 25.04.2019, quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to provide the compassionate appointment to the suitable post for the petitioner pursuant to her application dated 25.02.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Govardhanan

¶14

For Respondents : Ms.R.Janaki

¶15

Additional Government Pleader

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Writ Petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pertaining to the proceedings of the 2^nd respondent in Na.Ka.EN:212/A2/2019, dated 25.04.2019, quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to provide the compassionate appointment to the suitable post for the petitioner pursuant to her application dated 25.02.2019.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

¶20

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶21

3.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner belongs to ST Community and her husband, who also belongs to the same community, joined in service as multi purpose hospital worker on the basis of daily wages pursuant to the appointment order issued by the 2^nd respondent vide proceedings dated 03.08.2018. While he was in service, he died on 07.11.2018 due to his ill health. Thereafter, the petitioner has made an application for compassionate appointment. However, the said application was rejected by the 2^nd respondent vide his proceedings dated 25.04.2019 on the ground that the petitioner's husband employed as a daily wager on contract basis and that the daily wagers are not entitled for compassionate appointment. Hence, this writ petition.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the daily wagers are not entitled for compassionate appointment, they are entitled to claim on par with regular employees. However, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents to engage the petitioner as daily wager.

¶23

Learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents submitted that if any representation is made by the petitioner for engaging herself as daily wager, it would be considered.

¶24

Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to make a representation to the respondents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the respondents are directed to consider the same, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter.

¶25

In the result, with the above observation, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

¶30

¶31

1.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine D.M.S. Compound Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. 2.The Deputy Director of Health Services Perambalur District Perambalur-612 212.

¶32

3.The Block Medical Officer Primary Health Centre Valikandapuram Perambalur District. +1 cc to M/s.V.Govardhanan, Advocate Sr.No. 79510 +1 cc to The Government Pleader Sr.No.80725 AKM/01.11.19/3P-7C / W.P.No.27507 of 2019

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vijaya v. The Director of Publice Health

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijaya v. The Director of Publice Health

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.Jansi Rani Vs The Director of Elementary Education

C.Madhumitha Vs The Chairman

V.Purushothaman Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

K.Thangarasu Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

L.R.Ganesan Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

Salem Managarachi Vs The Joint Director of Municipal