Dismissed

D.Kuamravel, v. The Member Secretary

Madras HC5 Sept 2019WP/25252/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a 2006 selection list in a Teachers Selection Board recruitment. The court noted the petitioner had previously filed related litigation and emphasized the 13-year delay, finding no substance in the challenge.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed with no costs; consequentially connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

D.Kuamravel, Vs The Member Secretary — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :05.09.2019 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.25252 of 2019 and WMP.No.24827 of 2019

¶2

D. Kumaravel

¶3

..Petitioner vs

¶4

The Member Secretary, Teachers Selection Board, Government of Tamilnadu, EVK Sampath Maaligai, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 2. Mr. K. Mohammad Akhtar, 12/64, Thirukoilur Road, Elavasanur, Ulundurpettai Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶5

.. Respondents

¶6

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ or order or direction to call for the records pertained to the impugned provisional selection list issued by the 1st respondent dated on February, 2006 in respect of 2^nd respondent and quash the same and pass such further order.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr. M. Bharath

¶8

For Respondents: Mr. C. Munsamy, Special Government Pleader

¶9

The petitioner has filed the Writ Petition challenging the selection list published in the year 2006 on the ground that his name is not placed in the selection list.

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner participated in the Selection process in the year 2005 and the selection list was published in the year 2006, his name was not included in the selection list, for

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

which he made a representation to the first respondent, however his representation was not considered. Aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition is filed.

¶13

The learned Government pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that as per the selection list issued in February 2006, the persons who were selected had already been issued with appointment orders and therefore nothing survives in the Writ Petition.

¶14

On a perusal of the records, it is seen that with regard to his selection, the petitioner had already filed W.P.No.12603 of 2010 and the matter went upto filing of a Contempt Petition. Thus, having exhausted his remedy in the first round of litigation, now the petitioner has filed Writ Petition relating to a selection in the year 2006. However the Writ Petition has been filed after 13 years relating to an appointment made in the year 2006 and there is no proper explanation for such inordinate delay.

¶15

I do not find any substance and considering the latches. Accordingly the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mrn 1. The Member Secretary, Teachers Selection Board, Government of Tamilnadu, EVK Sampath Maaligai, College Road, Chennai-600 006. +1cc to Government Pleader sr.77720 +1cc to Mr. M. Bharath, Advocate sr.76712

¶16

W.P.No.25252 of 2019 and WMP.No.24827 of 2019

¶17

rsi(co) nr 21/10/2019

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Kuamravel, v. The Member Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Kuamravel, v. The Member Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Karthikeyan, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

D.Hariharen Vs The Principal Secretary / Commissioner

A.Jayanthimala Vs The Director of School Education

K.Kalaiyarasi Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

J.saranya Vs The State Tamilnadu

E.Gnanam (HC-14426) Vs The Director General of