Dismissed

M/S. Lakshmi Trade Credits v. the Assistant Engineer

Madras HC19 Jul 2019WP/24902/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition concerning a bus shelter obstructing the petitioner's premises, the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly, leaving costs unspecified.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.

M/S. Lakshmi Trade Credits Vs the Assistant Engineer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :19.07.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

W.P.No.24902 of 2008

¶6

M/s. Lakshmi Trade Credits Limited Represented by its Chariman P.G. Saranyan No.37/1, Cathedral Road, Chennai- 600 086.

¶7

..Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Assistant Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Building, Chennai- 600 003.

¶10

The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Building, Chennai- 600 003.

¶11

The Chief Engineer, Highways Department, Teynampet, Chennai- 600 006.

¶12

The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan Transport House, Pallavan Salai, Thiruvalluvar, Chennai- 600 002. .. Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to remove the bus shelter and not to put any structure in front of petitioner's premises at No.37/1, Cathedral Road, Chennai -600 086 moreso affecting the ingress and egress into the petitioner's premises.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

For Petitioner :Mr. S.R. Raghunathan

¶16

For Respondents :Mr. R.Arunmozhi, Standing Counsel for Chennai Corporation for R1 and R2

¶17

Mr. J. Ramesh, AGP for R3

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner to withdraw the petition, this Court has granted permission to withdraw the writ petition.

¶20

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// mrn Sub Assistant Registrar To

¶22

The Assistant Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Building, Chennai- 600 003.

¶23

The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Building, Chennai- 600 003.

¶24

The Chief Engineer, Highways Department, Teynampet, Chennai- 600 006.

¶25

The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan Transport House, Pallavan Salai, Thiruvalluvar, Chennai- 600 002.

¶26

+1 cc to Mr.M.Chidambaram, Advocate, S.R.No.61841 +1 cc to Mr.R.Arunmozhi, Advocate, S.R.No.61759

¶27

W.P.No.24902 of 2008 MP(CO) SSM(27/08/2019)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S. Lakshmi Trade Credits v. the Assistant Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Lakshmi Trade Credits v. the Assistant Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Radhakrishnan Vs NO.1628, Chinthadripet

Tvl.Amarkantak Farms (P) Ltd. Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Vasantha Carbide Pvt.Ltd Vs Union of India,Rep.by the

R. Chandra Vs the Secretary

C.J. Fernandez Vs Land Acquisition Officer Cum

Indira Nagar Residents Welfare Vs the Secretary