Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were dismissed as withdrawn by the court after recording the petitioners' submission and endorsement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 20.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
WP.Nos.24799 to 24801 of 2004 and WP.MP.Nos.30160 to 30162 of 2004
E.Balu ...Petitioner in WP.24799/2004
T.Punniya ...Petitioner in WP.24800/2004
D.Natarajan ...Petitioner in WP.24801/2004
Vs
Superintendent of Police,
District Police Office,
Thiruvallur District. ...Respondents in all WPs
COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceedings C.No.A2/18998/2004, D.O.No.463/2004 dated 31.07.2004 and quash thes same.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bala
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in these Writ Petitions has become infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw all the writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
hvk
To
The Superintendent of Police,
District Police Office,
Thiruvallur District.
+1cc to Government Pleader, High Court, Madras SR.No.16649
WP.Nos.24799 to 24801 of 2004
and
WP.MP.Nos.30160 to 30162 of 2004
SJ(CO)
GMY(19/03/2019)
E.Balu
T.Punniya
D.Natarajan
Superintendent of Police
District Police Office
Thiruvallur District
M.S. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
