Two writ petitions challenging notifications regarding student admissions were dismissed as infructuous after the petitioners withdrew the writs, with connected miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs awarded.
Petitions dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :01.08.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.Nos.11208 and 11209 of 2003 and
WMP.Nos.14051 to 14056 of 2003, 1035 of 2003, 1423 of 2004 and 1424 of 2004
..Petitioner in W.P.No.11208 of 2003
.. Respondents in both Wps.
Prayer W.P.No.11208 of 2003: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order calling for the records relating to the Notification of the 3rd respondent dated 20.12.2002 published in 'Hindu' along with records relating to communication in HOD (Spl. Exam.P&T) 2002 dated 18.12.2002 and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned and forbear the respondents from interfering with the right of admission of the petitioner of the Students for its deemed University and pass orders.
Prayer W.P.No.11209 of 2003: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order calling for the records relating to the Notification of the 3rd respondent dated 20.12.2002 published in 'Hindu' and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned and forbear the respondents from interfering with the right of admission of the petitioner of the Students for its deemed University and pass orders.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners made an endorsement which reads as follows:
“ Writ Petitions has become infructuous. In the circumstances, the petitions may be permitted to withdrawn or closed or infructuous leaving the issued raised in the writ petitions open and rights of the petitioners reserved to challenge in future if necessary”
s/dAssistant Registrar(CS-III)
True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar
mrn To 1.The Secretary to Government Union of India Ministry of Human Resources Development Department of Science and Higher Education, Sastri Bhavan, New Delhi- 110 001. 2. The Chairman University Grants Commission, Bhadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002, 3.The Head of the Department, Central Board of Secondary Education 17-B , I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110002 (Spl. Exams, Project & Training) 4. The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Higher Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009. +1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 66347 +1 CC to Mr.G.R. Associates sr 65993. +1 CC to Mr.P. Rosekamalam, Advocate sr 65992.
W.P.Nos.11208 and 11209 of 2003 and WMP.Nos.14051 to 14056 of 2003, 1035 of 2003, 1423 of 2004 and 1424 of 2004
PP(CO) SP(31/10/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shanmugha Arts Science Technology and Research Academy
Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya
Union of India
University Grants Commission
Central Board of Secondary Education
State of Tamil Nadu
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
