Dismissed

The Commissioner of Customs v. M/S.Mysore Sales International

Madras HC6 Nov 2019WP/23893/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Commissioner of Customs sought a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to produce electronic control units that were the subject of a completed auction. The single-judge bench dismissed the petition, holding that the court lacked territorial jurisdiction and could not order restitution of property already sold at auction.

What did the court decide?

Writ of mandamus dismissed. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed. No costs awarded.

The Commissioner of Customs Vs M/S.Mysore Sales… — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.11.2019

¶2

CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Writ Petition No.23893 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2008 and 2 of 2009

¶3

1 The Commissioner of Customs Central Revenue Buildings Queens Road Bangalore - 1.

¶4

.... Petitioner

¶5

¶6

1 M/s.Mysore Sales International Limited (MSIL) MSIL House opposite HAL Airport Bangalore - 17.

¶7

2 M/s.Kataria Impex (rep. by its Chief Executive Sri Moolchand Kataria) No.204 Walltax road I floor Chennai-1.

¶8

3 M/s.M.L.Automobiles

¶9

(rep. by its partner Shri Kamal Kumar Jain) No.2 old no.10 Byramjung Bahadur 2nd lane General Patterns Road Chennai.

¶10

.... Respondents

¶11

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to produce the electronic control units which were subject matter of the auction conducted by the 1st respondent in respect of lot No. 2286 of auction No.45 dated 12.7.2007 and consequently to direct the respondent to cooperate with the investigation of the petitioner department pursuant to the summons issued under section 108 of the Customs Act 1962.

¶12

1/3

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.A.P.Srinivas,

¶15

Sr. Standing Counsel

¶16

For Respondents : Mrs.Elizabeth Seshadri

¶17

for M/s.Iyer and Thomas - R1

¶18

Mr.B.Sathish sundar – R3 No appearance - R2

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the respondents to produce the electronic control units that were subject matter of auction conducted by the first respondent on 12.07.2007.

¶21

Such a mandamus cannot be granted for two reasons. Firstly, the first respondent is based at Bangalore and hence no cause of action arises before this Court. Secondly, the prayer itself is for putting back the clock which is impossible, insofar as the auction itself has been conducted and the lot sold.

¶22

Admittedly, the petitioner has issued summons/show cause notices to the respondents for adjudication. Hence, the only remedy, if any available to the petitioner, would be to continue with the adjudication proceedings strictly in accordance with law.

¶23

With these observations, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

+1 cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas Advocate sr92096

¶29

+1 cc to Mr.H.Karthik Seshadri Advocate sr 91767

¶30

Writ Petition No.23893 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2008 and 2 of 2009

¶31

pm(co) aa20/01/2020

¶32

3/3

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Commissioner of Customs v. M/S.Mysore Sales International

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Commissioner of Customs v. M/S.Mysore Sales International

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Namakkal Vatta Anaithu Vs the Commissioner

Samundeeswari Nagar Vs The District Collector

Shri J.Srinivasan Vs The Assistant Director of

Smt. P.Hema, Vs the Commissioner of Income Tax

M.Khader Mohideen, Vs the District Collector

M/S.Pollachi Sarvodaya Sangh Vs the Special Committee