M.Khader Mohideen, v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition seeking to close a TASMAC shop, the High Court of Madras examined the counter affidavit confirming the shop remained closed due to public objections. Recording this, the court closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Closed Writ Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.11.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Writ Petition No.18365 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
M.Khader Mohideen
.... Petitioner
vs
1 The District Collector, Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
2 The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Co-operation,
4th Floor, 2nd Tower C.M.D.A., Gandhi-Irwin Road, Egmore,
Chennai – 600 008.
3 The President,
Melakottayur Panchayat,
Chennai – 600 127.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Khader Mohideen
- respondent
The District Collector, Kancheepuram District
- respondent
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Co-operation
- respondent
The President, Melakottayur Panchayat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court