Quashed

P.N.Chinnathambi v. The Deputy Registrar of

Madras HC18 Jan 2019WP/23196/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside a conditional attachment order under Section 167(2) of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act. The Court held that such proceedings can only be initiated if proceedings under Sections 87, 90, 130, or 139 are pending, or upon a report under Section 81, none of which existed against the petitioner. The Writ Petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

The impugned conditional attachment order dated 09.08.2018 was set aside. The petitioner was directed that no such proceedings can be initiated at this stage.

P.N.Chinnathambi Vs The Deputy Registrar of — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.01.2019

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶4

W.P.No.23196 of 2018 and WMP.No.27097 of 2018

¶5

P.N.Chinnathambi ... Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Erode Circle, Erode, Erode District.

¶8

2.The Supervisor, Erode District Central Co-operative Bank, Erode, Erode District.

¶9

3.The Co-operative Sub Registrar/Field Officer, Perundurai,Erode District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order with the caption 'conditional attachment order' dated 09.08.2018 passed by the first respondent, quash the same.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.C.E.Pratap For Respondents : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram

¶11

Special Government Pleader

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This writ petition has been filed challenging the conditional attachment order dated 09.08.2018 under Section 167 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act (“Act” in short) attaching the petitioner's property.

¶14

2.According to the petitioner, he was the Honorary President of the Board of Management of one Panikampalayam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Ltd, wherein one Subramaniam working as the Private Secretary of the Society has committed some irregularities, for which, the petitioner no way responsible. Now, no proceeding is pending against the petitioner either under Section 87 or under Section 90 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, but the first respondent

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

erroneously attached the petitioner's property under Section 167 (2) of the Act.

¶17

3.Earlier, notice was ordered to the respondents to find out whether any proceeding is pending against the petitioner. Today, when the matter is came up for hearing, Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that only an enquiry under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative societies Act is pending, and so far no enquiry report has been filed by the Enquiry Officer.

¶18

4.The proceedings under Section 167(2) of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Act can be initiated only in cases where a proceeding is pending under Section 87 or under Section 90 or under Section 130 or under Section 139 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act. Admittedly, now no such proceeding is pending against the petitioner, only an enquiry under Section 81 of the Act is pending. It is well settled that the enquiry under Section 81 of the Act is only a kind of investigation into the constitution, working of financial conditions of a registered society or any alleged misappropriation, fraudulent retention of money or property, breach of trust or any mismanagement in relation to the society. Only based on the report filed under Section 81 of the said Act, further proceedings can be initiated against any persons involved in any act of misconduct. Admittedly, in the present case, only the enquiry is pending and no report has been filed implicating the petitioner for any of the irregularities.

¶19

5.In the above said circumstances, the proceedings under Section 167(2) of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act cannot be initiated at this stage. Therefore, the impunged order passed by the first respondent dated 09.08.2018 is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, set aside. It is always open to the respondent to initiate any such proceedings based on the enquiry report filed under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act.

¶20

6.With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected WMP is closed.

¶21

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

rrg/arb

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

1.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Erode Circle, Erode,
Erode District.
2.The Supervisor,
Erode District Central Co-operative Bank,
Erode, Erode District.
3.The Co-operative Sub Registrar/Field Officer,
Perundurai,
Erode District.
+1cc to Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Advocate, S.R.No.4527
+1cc to Mr.C.E.Pratap, Advocate, S.R.No.3860
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.4011.
W.P.No.23196 of 2018
VSNII(CO)
rrs 26/02/2019

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.N.Chinnathambi v. The Deputy Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.N.Chinnathambi v. The Deputy Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sundararaj Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

K.Punniyakoti Vs The Registrar of Cooperative

V.Kamalakannan Vs Inspector of Police

K.Thangaraj Vs The Tamil Nadu State Election Commissioner

V.Gowthaman Vs The Commissioner

Dr.C.Maheswaran Vs Director