Disposed

S.Sundararaj v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC11 Jan 2019WP/504/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the rejection of a petitioner's tender was dismissed because the tender had been cancelled and a fresh tender was being called, rendering further adjudication unnecessary in the petition. The connected writ miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

The present Writ Petition stands dismissed. The connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

S.Sundararaj Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.01.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

W.P.504 of 2019 and W.M.P.516 of 2019

¶6

S.Sundararaj ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

¶9

Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Chennai-1.

¶10

The District Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

¶11

Asst. Executive Engineer, Trichirappalli Regional Town Panchayats, Trichirappalli.

¶12

Executive Officer, Poolambadi Town Panchayat, Perambalur, Perambalur District. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER :

¶14

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 07.12.2018 in Na.Ka.No.548/2018 passed by the 5^th respondent and quash the same; consequently direct the 5^th respondent to process the petitioner's tender by opening his price bid in respect of the contract work in the Tender Notification in Na.Ka.No.2898/2018/Vu3 dated 08.11.2018 issued by the 5^th respondent.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Neelakandan

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.R.Govindasamy, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4 Mr.E.Balamurugan, Special Government Pleader for R5

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order rejecting the petitioner's tender on the ground that he is not qualified.

¶20

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the tender itself has been cancelled, and a fresh tender is going to be called for. In the said circumstances, there is no further adjudication required in the Writ Petition. Hence, the present Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpp To 1. The Principal Secretary to Government,Government of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Chennai-1. 3. The District Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

Asst. Executive Engineer,

¶24

Trichirappalli Regional

¶25

Town Panchayats,

¶26

Trichirappalli.

¶27

Executive Officer,

¶28

Poolambadi Town Panchayat,

¶29

Perambalur,

¶30

Perambalur District.

¶31

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.3956, 4016

¶32

W.P.504 of 2019
and
W.M.P.516 of 2019
SV(CO)
CS/05/03/2019

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Sundararaj v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sundararaj v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rev.Prince Bakthasingh Vs The Commissioner

R.Gopalsamy, Vs The Secretary to Government

M.S.Palani Vs The Regional Transport Officer

K.Punniyakoti Vs The Registrar of Cooperative

V.Kamalakannan Vs Inspector of Police

J.Ramsingh, Vs The Secretary