Petitioner sought withdrawal of the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 challenging a Government Order regarding land lease for a zoological park. The petition was withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate relief elsewhere.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach concerned authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.11.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
G.Rangaswamy, Secretary, The Coimbatore Zoological Park and Conservation Centre, having its registered office at Pioneer House, Peelamedu, Coimbatore-641 004. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
Ward Member, Old no.13/46 & New No.13/46, Kondanur Pudur, No.24, Veerapandi Panchayat, Coimbatore-641 108.
R4 to R8 impleaded as per order dated 09.12.2010 in M.P.2/2010 ... Respondents (in WP.NO.23075/10)
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent G.O.Ms.No.426, Revenue [LD2 (2)] department, dated 07.09.2010 and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to execute a lease deed in favour of the petitioner herein to get permission from the Central Zoo Authority of India for formation of Zoological park in the leased out lands by the 1st respondent vide G.O.Ms.No.285, Revenue Department dated 13.04.1998.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Munirathnam For Respondents : Mr.I.Satish, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3
Mr.K.Chandrasekaran for R4 to R8 O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to approach the Government for appropriate relief, and he has also made endorsement to that effect.
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to approach the concerned authorities seeking for appropriate relief. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Assistant Registrar(insp cell)
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
rpp
To
1. The Secretary,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Revenue Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai-600 009.
2. The Principal Secretary and
Commissioner of Land Administration,
Ezhilagam,
Chepauk,
Chennai-600 005.
3. The District Collector,
Coimbatore District,
Coimbatore.
+1cc to Mr.A.Divakaran , Advocate SR.No. 97216
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 98075
+1cc to Mr.G.Munirathnam , Advocate SR.No. 96798
W.P. 23075 of 2010
and
M.P. 1 of 2010
gj (CO)
A.SK(27/11/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Rangaswamy
The State of Tamil Nadu
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
