The petitioner sought to restrain respondents from preventing access to the sea-shore. The learned counsel obtained permission to withdraw the writ petition at the hearing. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.09.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 22927 of 2019 and W.M.P. No. 22567 of 2019
P.Vijaya
... Petitioner
-vs-
Chennai – 600 004
3.P.Madhavan
4.M.Kanthakumar ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents from preventing the petitioner and her family to have access to the Sea-shore / Beach and Sea of the Bay of Bengal from the Petitioner's Property bearing Door No.72, Ellai Amman Colony, Nochikuppam, Mylapore, Chennai–600 004.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ragoth for Mr.K.Selvaraj
For R1 : Mrs. D.Latha For R2 to R4 : Mr.A.P.Sathyamurthy,
The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded.
lok
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Nochikuppam, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004
+1cc to Ms.D.Latha, Advocate, SR.No.78007
W.P. No. 22927 of 2019
and W.M.P. No. 22567 of 2019
Kak(03.10.2019)
P.Vijaya
Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board
M.Muthu
P.Madhavan
M.Kanthakumar
P.D.Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
