Dismissed

S.Babu Sankar v. The District Collector

Madras HC6 Sept 2019WP/26649/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Madras heard a writ petition seeking certiorari and mandamus to quash an order and direct issuance of a certificate for a name change. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted the prayer. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to work out remedies before the competent forum.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to petitioner to work out remedies before the competent forum.

S.Babu Sankar Vs The District Collector — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.09.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P. No.26649 of 2019

¶6

S.Babu Sankar ... Petitioner

¶7

-vs-

¶8

The District Collector, Chennai District, No.32, Rajaji Salai, Singaravelar Maaligai, Chennai 600 001.

¶9

The Thasildar, Sholinganallur,

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the second respondent dated 18.07.2019 and quash the same and further direct the second respondent to issue the certified copy of certificate in the name of petitioner's father namely Sankara Subramaniya Iyer @ Sankar Iyer, S/o. Pethavai Iyer who is one and the same.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. R.Sathiyamoorthy

¶13

For Respondents: Mr. J.H.Iniyan, Government Advocate

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

When the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner was required to show the legal provision under which the Second Respondent had the power to issue certificate that various names in different documents related to the same person, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to the Petitioner to work out his remedies for necessary relief before the competent forum in the manner recognized by law and he has made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting such liberty. No costs.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IX)

¶19

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The District Collector,
Chennai District,
No.32, Rajaji Salai,
Singaravelar Maaligai,
Chennai 600 001.
2. The Thasildar,
Sholinganallur,
Chennai 600 119.
3.The Deputy Registrar,
Records,
High Court, Madras.
+2cc to Mr. R.Sathiyamoorthy, Advocate sr.77146
W.P. No.26649 of 2019
nrjk(co)
nr 16/09/2019

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Babu Sankar v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Babu Sankar v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Maira Packia Seelan Vs the Director of School

A.Muthusamy Vs The District Collector

M/s.Annai Solid Blocks, Vs The District Collector

Nipun Maheshwari Vs The Drug Inspector

Dr.Santosh Mahalingham Vs Union of India

Mena Kana Annachathiram, Vs Indian Bank